Each module of a simulation game consists of three parts: an introduction
to the chosen subject, the actual game and the evaluation.
Before the game, the participants work to acquire the necessary
knowledge about the basic constellation of the chosen conflict or
negotiation situation. Each group also receives information tailored
to their particular situation, giving them insight into their perspective
on the negotiations, their interests, their domestic constraints
as well as their potential allies. Participants can also be involved
in the preparation of the game, through individual research or compiling
information about the individual roles.
In longer seminars, participants are often encouraged to become
involved in the preparation of the game. This may entail individual
research or compiling information about the individual roles.
|
For the actual simulation
game, there are two possible versions, of which hybrid forms can
also be produced. In a purely negotiation-based game, negotiations
are simulated which may or may not lead to a final agreement. We
feel it is crucial that on the fringe of official negotiations,
participants also engage in informal talks. In an action-oriented
game, protagonists can have a direct impact on the course of events
through open or hidden actions.
The beginning of each game consists of each group establishing
their position and goals. As with real negotiating parties, power
is unevenly distributed among the players according to the chosen
situation: the larger the political and economic weight of a negotiating
party, the bigger their ability to impose their own terms upon an
agreement with the other groups. A rigid time frame is a further
parameter intended for participants, as negotiations in reality
tend to take place under considerable time pressure.
After the game, the results are evaluated and linked to the initially
acquired information. The groups compare their achievements with
their initial goals, evaluate the course of the game and try to
develop options for the conflict’s solution “in the
real world“. The participants are also urged to develop a
critical view of their own actions.
|